@conference {1984371,
	title = {Do Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement?},
	booktitle = {WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP)},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2022},
	address = {Copenhagen, Denmark,  Dec. 2022},
	abstract = {To better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior.  However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs.},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	url = {https://aisel.aisnet.org/wisp2022/19},
	author = {Marshall,Byron and Shadbad,Forough and Curry,Michael and Biros,David}
}
@conference {1970491,
	title = {Do Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement?},
	booktitle = {WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP)},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2022},
	address = {Copenhagen, Denmark,  Dec. 2022},
	abstract = {To better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior.  However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs.},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	author = {Marshall,Byron and Shadbad,Forough and Curry,Michael and Biros,David}
}
@article {1977451,
	title = {Disentangling IT Artifact Bias},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	address = {Orlando, Florida},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	author = {Curry,Michael and Marshall,Byron}
}
@conference {1984386,
	title = {Does Using CobiT Improve IT Solution Proposals?},
	booktitle = {AAA Annual Meeting, IS Section},
	year = {2010},
	month = {2010},
	abstract = {The CobiT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology) framework is designed to help organizations implement IT governance practices by systematically shaping identifiable IT processes to better leverage IT expenditures. The control structure advocated in CobiT embodies governance notions including business alignment, a risk/control perspective, systematic measurement, accountability, and continuous improvement. Despite the rise of internal control regulation, not all organizations have implemented systematic IT controls and many, notably small, organizations may never do so. This study explores whether exposing decision makers to CobiT positively affects the IT solutions they generate. We present a framework (drawn primarily from the structure of CobiT) for identifying normatively better IT plans as measured by application of governance principles. We report on 115 IT solution proposals created by business students. The proposals developed using CobiT more frequently took a risk/control approach, addressed the need for continuous improvement, referred to general IT processes, identified the people who should implement a solution, and proposed more measures of success. Thus, exposing decision makers to a systematic IT governance framework promises to help them generate more comprehensive solutions to IT challenges.},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	author = {Marshall,Byron and Curry,Michael and Reitsma,Reindert}
}
@conference {1969176,
	title = {Delivering Value Beyond Efficiency with Visualized XBRL},
	booktitle = {International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009)},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	address = {Phoenix, AZ},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	author = {Marshall,Byron and Mortenson,Kristian and Bourne,Amy and Price,Kevin and Marshall,Andrew}
}
@conference {1984591,
	title = {Dimensional Standard Alignment in K-12 Digital Libraries: Assessment of Self-found vs. Recommended Curriculum},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL{\textquoteright}09), Austin, TX},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	keywords = {Accounting, BIS},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555400.1555403},
	author = {Marshall,Byron and Reitsma,Reindert and Zarske,Malinda}
}
