@article {1976016,
	title = {The Impact of Bankruptcy on Competitors: How Technology Overlap and Diversification Affect Value Redistribution.},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	address = {Atlanta, GA},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Arthurs,Jonathan and Cho,Sam Yul and Choi,Yohan and Hemmatian,Iman and Joshi,Amol}
}
@conference {1968406,
	title = {Impact of Bankruptcy on Rivals: How Tech Overlap and Diversification Affects Value Redistribution},
	booktitle = {Academy of Management Proceedings},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	abstract = {Prior research on bankruptcy proposes two potential outcomes for a bankrupt firm{\textquoteright}s industry rivals: a contagion effect wherein rivals{\textquoteright} stock prices decline, and a competitive effect wherein rivals benefit from a competitor{\textquoteright}s decline. Although empirical evidence substantiates the contagion effect, existing studies do not consistently account for the competitive effect. We develop and test theory explaining how the degree of technology overlap and diversification strategy of competitors influences the severity of the contagion effect and the expected occurrence of the competitive effect among rivals. We find that greater technology overlap among a bankrupt firm and its competitors exacerbates the contagion effect. Furthermore, competitors with higher unrelated diversification are more susceptible to contagion, while competitors with higher related diversification benefit more from a rival{\textquoteright}s bankruptcy.},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Arthurs,Jonathan and Cho,Sam Yul and Choi,Yohan and Hemmatian,Iman and Joshi,Amol}
}
@inbook {1972096,
	title = {Innovation Policy},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2014},
	pages = {5},
	address = {London, UK},
	abstract = {This entry outlines the concept of innovation policy in the domain of strategic management. First, an overview of the history, goals and underlying principles of innovation policy is presented. Next, the primary functions and possible means of implementing innovation policy are described with an emphasis on theoretical foundations. Finally, the evaluation of innovation policy outcomes, including the intended and unintended consequences of policy changes, are briefly discussed.},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Joshi,Amol}
}
@conference {1972101,
	title = {Information Asymmetry and Partner Selection in International Alliances},
	booktitle = {Academy of Management Proceedings},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	abstract = {We extend prior research on intra-firm language barriers by investigating inter-firm language barriers in cross-border alliances. Integrating concepts from sociolinguistics and information economics, we posit that language barriers between potential partners exacerbate information asymmetries, while market signals of the commercial value of a partner{\textquoteright}s knowledge counteract these asymmetries. To test these ideas, we quantify language barriers using a distance measure of linguistic differences and we analyze data on semiconductor alliances during 1988-2001. Controlling for cultural, geographical, and technological distances, our empirical results suggest that firms overcome large language distances by relying on market signals of a prospective partner{\textquoteright}s level of disclosure, stock of knowledge, and degree of specialization. Stronger signals significantly dampen the negative impact of language distance on the chances of forming an alliance.},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Joshi,Amol and Lahiri,Nandini}
}
