@article {1972691,
	title = {Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments.},
	journal = {Academy of Management Journal},
	volume = {55},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	pages = {1316-1333},
	abstract = {It is well understood that moral identity substantially influences moral judgments. However, occupational identities are also replete with moral content, and individuals may have multiple occupational identities within a given work role (e.g., engineer-manager). Consequently, we apply the lenses of moral universalism and moral particularism to categorize occupational identities and explore their moral prescriptions. We present and test a model of occupational identities as implicitly-held and dynamically-activated knowledge structures, cued by context and containing associated content about the absolute and/or relationship-dependent moral obligations owed by the actor to stakeholders. Results from one field study and two situated experiments with dual-occupation individuals indicate that moral obligations embedded in occupational identities influence actors{\textquoteright} work-role moral judgments in a predictable and meaningful manner.},
	keywords = {Management},
	author = {Leavitt,Keith and Reynolds,Scott J and Barnes,Christopher M and Schilpzand,Pauline and Hannah,Sean T}
}
